to edit and comment
a collaborative knowledge base characterizing the state of current thought in Cognitive Science.
The Relative Reinforcing Efficacy Purchase Task (RREPT) is a 9-item task that assesses different aspects of behavioral demand based on the relationship between demand and price. Demand is reduced as price is increased, and the differences in shape of the demand curve are measures of how reinforcing a substance is. Participants are asked to indicate how many cigarettes they would purchase and consume in a single day if the price per cigarette was $0.00 (free), $0.10, $1.00, $3.00, $10.00, $30.00, $100.00, $300.00, and $1,000.00.

Definition contributed by JShaw
Relative Reinforcing Efficacy Purchase Task has been asserted to measure the following CONCEPTS
as measured by the contrast:




Phenotypes associated with Relative Reinforcing Efficacy Purchase Task

Disorders

No associations have been added.

Traits

No associations have been added.

Behaviors

No associations have been added.


IMPLEMENTATIONS of Relative Reinforcing Efficacy Purchase Task
No implementations have been added.
EXTERNAL DATASETS for Relative Reinforcing Efficacy Purchase Task
No implementations have been added.
CONDITIONS

Experimental conditions are the subsets of an experiment that define the relevant experimental manipulation.

CONTRASTS

You must specify conditions before you can define contrasts.


In the Cognitive Atlas, we define a contrast as any function over experimental conditions. The simplest contrast is the indicator value for a specific condition; more complex contrasts include linear or nonlinear functions of the indicator across different experimental conditions.

INDICATORS

No indicators have yet been associated.

An indicator is a specific quantitative or qualitative variable that is recorded for analysis. These may include behavioral variables (such as response time, accuracy, or other measures of performance) or physiological variables (including genetics, psychophysiology, or brain imaging data).

Term BIBLIOGRAPHY